The Intrinsic Value and Healing Power of Autobiographic Narratives

  • whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • koo
The Intrinsic Value and Healing Power of Autobiographic Narratives

*The (Im)Possibilities of Bearing Witness:*

*The Intrinsic Value and Healing Power of Autobiographic Narratives*

carpentier nico via

Thu, Sep 10, 3:24 PM (23 hours ago)

to commlist

*The (Im)Possibilities of Bearing Witness:*

*The Intrinsic Value and Healing Power of Autobiographic Narratives*

The Witnessing Working Group of the Memory Studies Association (MSA) is

organizing a roundtable during the forthcoming MSA annual conference in

Warsaw, Poland, July 5-9, 2021. Due to Covid-19, virtual participation

will be possible. This roundtable will discuss the role of the

researcher and the ways in which his/her testimony with traumatic

experiences influences the course of research, but also the way in which

the individual traumatic experiences of the researcher affect his/her

trauma research methodology and narratives produced. Besides that, we

would like to explore ways through which witness testimonies can

influence researchers and ordinary readers and if (and to what extent)

such testimonies may help post-trauma healing and recovery.

According to the psychiatrist Dori Laub, a victim needs the presence of

a witness (an empathetic listener or reader), to confront the darkness

of painful memories and to organize and process traumatic experiences.

"'Arousers' of memories" helpedHolocaust survivor Primo Levi (1990)

describe the horrors of Auschwitz and discover meaning in writing and

literature. For him, the true witness is the one who does not survive.

Hence the survivor bears the responsibility to speak for those who

cannot speak, or to serve as a "moral witness," to testify with a "moral

purpose" (Margalit, 2002, 149). Often researchers are put in the

position of the (moral) witness while investigating the impact of

traumatic events. How does such implied moral purpose influence the

scholarly endeavors? And how does the arousal of the scholar's own

memories in the process of witnessing shape the course of the research

conducted? Can a researcher turn into "a witness to himself"/herself

(Laub, 1991, 58), potentially working through his/her own traumatic past

while witnessing the trauma of others? And how can such self-reflections

and self-explorations—of the survivor and/or researcher—be productively

integrated into scholarly writings, possibly exploring paths of healing,

which reach a wider audience than the ivory tower of academia?

This roundtable is meant as a forum for researchers from various

academic fields (including but not limited to anthropology, history,

psychology as well as literary, film and media studies). We seek papers

of 10 minutes length allowing for an extended discussion.Please submit a

paper proposal (not exceeding 250 words) in addition to a short bio (no

longer than 200 words including pertinent publications) via e-mail to

Alma Jeftic ( ) and

Stefanie Hofer ( ) *by October 2,

2020*. Please note that we aim to submit panels to the organising

committee of the Memory Studies Association *by 15^th October 2020* and

the final decision will depend on this committee. As in previous years,

all presenters have to be members of MSA.

For more information please consult MSA webpage:

Proposals not limited to the following topics are invited:

-How can traumatic narratives in scholarship be represented to

adequately reflect the suffering of the victim?

-(Im)possibilities of bearing witness and how to be addressed in

qualitative research?

-Witnessing and the dangers of appropriation

-The overwhelming nature of autobiographical narratives

-The healing power of trauma narratives

-Cultural representations of trauma and recovery as catharses

-(Moral) witnessing and activism

-Postcolonial witnessing and non-Western healing paradigms

Next Story
Share it